ROSE Thomas's profile
avatar

ROSE Thomas

  • Institut für Geowissenschaften, Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Archaeometry, Ceramics, Computational archaeology, Protohistory, Raw materials, Taphonomy

Recommendations:  0

Review:  1

Areas of expertise
I am a mineralogist/geochemist and archaeologist by training. I am a doctoral student at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer-Sheva, Israel) and the Sapienza (Rome, Italy) and a visiting researcher of the Deutsche Bergbau-Museum (Bochum, Germany). I am currently coordinating the measure “NFDI Commons” of the NFDI4Earth at the Goethe University Frankfurt. My research focusses on the development and application of new methods and concepts for the reconstruction of ancient copper metallurgy and its impact on past societies. I aim for a holistic approach with special emphasis on the combination of experimental and analytical techniques based on a sound understanding of the underlying physico-chemical processes. I am particularly passionate about exploring the potential of stable metal isotopes and to unleash the power of R and the FAIR principles to develop new tools for research.

Review:  1

23 Nov 2023
article picture

Percolation Package - From script sharing to package publication

Sharing Research Code in Archaeology

Recommended by based on reviews by Thomas Rose, Joe Roe and 1 anonymous reviewer

​The paper “Percolation Package – From Script Sharing to Package Publication” by Sophie C. Schmidt and Simon Maddison (2023) describes the development of an R package designed to apply Percolation Analysis to archaeological spatial data. In an earlier publication, Maddison and Schmidt (2020) describe Percolation Analysis and provide case studies that demonstrate its usefulness at different spatial scales. In the current paper, the authors use their experience collaborating to develop the R package as part of a broader argument for the importance of code sharing to the research process. 

The paper begins by describing the development process of the R package, beginning with borrowing code from a geographer, refining it to fit archaeological case studies, and then collaborating to further refine and systematize the code into an R package that is more easily reusable by other researchers. As the review by Joe Roe noted, a strength of the paper is “presenting the development process as it actually happens rather than in an idealized form.” The authors also include a section about the lessons learned from their experience. 

Moving on from the anecdotal data of their own experience, the authors also explore code sharing practices in archaeology by briefly examining two datasets. One dataset comes from “open-archaeo” (https://open-archaeo.info/), an on-line list of open-source archaeological software maintained by Zack Batist. The other dataset includes articles published between 2018 and 2023 in the Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology. Schmidt and Maddison find that these two datasets provide contrasting views of code sharing in archaeology: many of the resources in the open-archaeo list are housed on Github, lack persistent object identifiers, and many are not easily findable (other than through the open-archaeo list). Research software attached to the published articles, on the other hand, is more easily findable either as a supplement to the published article, or in a repository with a DOI.

The examination of code sharing in archaeology through these two datasets is preliminary and incomplete, but it does show that further research into archaeologists’ code-writing and code-sharing practices could be useful. Archaeologists often create software tools to facilitate their research, but how often?  How often is research software shared with published articles? How much attention is given to documentation or making the software usable for other researchers? What are best (or good) practices for sharing code to make it findable and usable? Schmidt and Maddison’s paper provides partial answers to these questions, but a more thorough study of code sharing in archaeology would be useful. Differences among journals in how often they publish articles with shared code, or the effects of age, gender, nationality, or context of employment on attitudes toward code sharing seem like obvious factors for a future study to consider.

Shared code that is easy to find and easy to use benefits the researchers who adopt code written by others, but code authors also have much to gain by sharing. Properly shared code becomes a citable research product, and the act of code sharing can lead to productive research collaborations, as Schmidt and Maddison describe from their own experience. The strength of this paper is the attention it brings to current code-sharing practices in archaeology. I hope the paper will also help improve code sharing in archaeology by inspiring more archaeologists to share their research code so other researchers can find and use (and cite) it. 

References

Maddison, M.S. and Schmidt, S.C. (2020). Percolation Analysis – Archaeological Applications at Widely Different Spatial Scales. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 3(1), p.269–287. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.54 

Schmidt, S. C., and Maddison, M. S. (2023). Percolation Package - From script sharing to package publication, Zenodo, 7966497, ver. 3 peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7966497

avatar

ROSE Thomas

  • Institut für Geowissenschaften, Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Archaeometry, Ceramics, Computational archaeology, Protohistory, Raw materials, Taphonomy

Recommendations:  0

Review:  1

Areas of expertise
I am a mineralogist/geochemist and archaeologist by training. I am a doctoral student at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (Beer-Sheva, Israel) and the Sapienza (Rome, Italy) and a visiting researcher of the Deutsche Bergbau-Museum (Bochum, Germany). I am currently coordinating the measure “NFDI Commons” of the NFDI4Earth at the Goethe University Frankfurt. My research focusses on the development and application of new methods and concepts for the reconstruction of ancient copper metallurgy and its impact on past societies. I aim for a holistic approach with special emphasis on the combination of experimental and analytical techniques based on a sound understanding of the underlying physico-chemical processes. I am particularly passionate about exploring the potential of stable metal isotopes and to unleash the power of R and the FAIR principles to develop new tools for research.