PCI Archaeology

411

Title *

Cultural Significance Assessment of Archaeological Sites for Heritage Management: From Text of Spatial Networks of Meaningsuse asterix (*) to get italics

Authors *

Yael Alef, Yuval ShafririPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

Year *

2024

Picture *

Abstract *

<p>This study examines the shift towards a values-based approach for Archaeological Resource Management (ARM), emphasizing the integration of Context-Based Significance Assessment (CBSA) with semantic technologies into digital ARM inventories. We uncovered the 'context-effect' phenomenon through qualitative analysis of inventory records from 66 ancient synagogues in northern Israel, with the Huqoq Synagogue as a detailed case study. This phenomenon shows how a site's cultural significance is significantly enhanced by its reciprocal relationships with various contextual elements—such as artifacts, narratives, and traditions—which, in turn, gain added value through their interconnections, weaving a spatial network of meaning. Using knowledge graph visualization, we demonstrate the applications of semantic technologies in representing these contextual elements and their interconnected values. This marks a shift from the traditional inventory as lists of sites to a network of heritage entities. The Huqoq case study provides insights into the broader implications for ARM and the practical challenges of modeling contextual relationships within knowledge graphs. The paper briefly explores the potential of generative AI to address some of these challenges and outlines a research agenda for CBSA integration in ARM inventories. Overall, the study provides insights into the transformative impact of semantic technologies in CBSA and ARM inventories and offers a potential pathway to enhance values-based management decision-making.</p>

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these data (if you have any problems with the deposit of your data, please contact contact@archaeo.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw data are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint. *

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10903738You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these scripts (if you have any problems with the deposit of your scripts, please contact contact@archaeo.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw scripts are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint. *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI, SWHID or URL) giving public access to these codes (if you have any problems with the deposit of your codes, please contact contact@archaeo.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw codes are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint. *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Keywords (optional)

Archaeological Resource Management (ARM), Heritage Inventory, Semantic Technologies, Knowledge-Graph (KG), Context-effect, Conservation, Ancient synagogues, Israel, Linked Data

Methods that require specific expertise (optional)

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Thematic fields *

Computational archaeology, Conservation/Museum studies, Spatial analysis

Suggested reviewers - Suggest up to 10 reviewers (provide names and Email addresses). (Optional)

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

No need for them to be recommenders of PCIArchaeology. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

Opposed reviewers - Suggest up to 5 people not to invite as reviewers. (Optional)

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

Submission date

2023-09-01 22:24:15

Recommender

James Stuart Taylor

Reviewers

or Register
Submit a preprint